2019 Spring Meeting and 15th Global Congress on Process Safety

(55ak) A Comparative Study of the Optimization Models for the Gas Detector Placement in Process Facilities

Authors

Liu, Y. - Presenter, China University of Petroleum (East China)
Zhang, B., China University of Petroleum ?East China?
Chen, G., China university of petroleum (East China)
Mu, C., China university of petroleum
Gas detector network is an important layer of protection in process facilities for prevention gas release accidents of turning into fire and explosion disasters. But traditional standards just provide basic principles of the installation of gas detectors. Recently mathematical programming gradually became an important method to solve the problem. When using the mathematical programming method to optimize the detector layout, different optimization strategies will result in different optimization target models and detector layouts. In this study, three models have been developed and contrasted, namely minimal detection time P-Median model (MITP), minimal leakage concentration P-Median model (MICP), and minimal individual risk P-median model (MIRP), for the optimization of the gas detector placement based on stochastic programming. And as a basis, possible release scenarios were identified. In order to achieve the goal of using finite discrete scenarios to represent all scenarios effectively and quantitatively, clustering analysis was used to filter similar scenarios and select representative leak scenarios. The input data of these models was obtained from computational fluid dynamics. Furthermore, an adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm was applied to solve these models. The gas detector network optimization in a diesel hydrogenation unit was carried out as a case study. Results demonstrate that the MICP model is superior to the MITP model and MIRP model in describing the integrity of hazardous gas leakage and diffusion distribution. But the cumulative detection time of its optimized layout is slightly longer than that of MITP. Moreover, the control effect of MIRP model on personal risk caused by hazardous gas leakage was increased by 24.2%, although the minimum number of detectors was slightly higher than that of MICP model.