2025 Spring Meeting and 21st Global Congress on Process Safety
(146b) Harmonizing Facility Siting Practices across Borders: Insights from a Global Corporation
Authors
The paper begins by defining the drivers for standardizing facility siting, with an emphasis on the need for consistency in regulatory compliance, safety, operational efficiency, and environmental protection. The company’s objective was to harmonize facility siting practices across a wide range of global locations, while ensuring adherence to both local and international regulations, minimizing safety risks, and optimizing resource utilization. Given the high-risk nature of the chemical and process industries, where even minor lapses in site planning can lead to severe operational and safety issues, this exercise was pivotal to maintaining a safe and efficient global operations footprint.
Key challenges encountered during the standardization process include navigating the vast differences in local regulatory requirements, zoning laws, and safety standards across multiple regions. These regulatory disparities created significant hurdles in aligning global siting practices. Moreover, when incorporating newly acquired sites into the company’s global framework, the team faced additional difficulties in addressing legacy practices, outdated infrastructure, and non-compliant safety protocols. Many of these sites, acquired through mergers and acquisitions, did not meet the company’s global safety and environmental standards, requiring substantial retrofitting and redesign efforts.
A critical component of the initiative was the integration of these newly acquired sites into the global siting strategy. The paper explores how the company conducted detailed audits and gap assessments of each site, and the role of cross-functional teams—comprising safety experts, engineers, and local regulatory specialists—in identifying and mitigating the risks associated with legacy issues. In many instances, the standardization process required updating facility layouts, upgrading safety systems, and implementing new technologies to ensure alignment with modern best practices in the industry.
The paper also highlights the challenge of balancing cost considerations with safety and compliance requirements. While there was a strong emphasis on operational efficiency and minimizing capital expenditures, the organization’s commitment to safety and regulatory compliance necessitated strategic trade-offs. The document outlines the methodologies employed to assess and manage these trade-offs, ensuring that cost reductions did not come at the expense of operational safety or environmental protection.
Drawing from the company's experience, the paper concludes with a set of recommendations for multinational organizations looking to standardize facility siting practices. These include the importance of a phased approach, beginning with thorough risk assessments and site evaluations, and the development of a centralized global siting strategy that incorporates regional expertise while adhering to uniform global standards. The company’s journey underscores the necessity of continuous stakeholder engagement, staff training, and a knowledge-sharing platform to foster long-term success in facility siting standardization. Through this case study, the paper offers actionable insights and best practices that can serve as a roadmap for other multinational organizations in the chemical and process industries, demonstrating how a comprehensive approach to facility siting standardization can enhance safety, compliance, and operational efficiency across a global footprint.