Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2012 Spring Meeting & 8th Global Congress on Process Safety
- Global Congress on Process Safety
- Case Studies
- (132a) Two Incompetent Workers; Too Close for Comfort – Part 1
Most papers of case studies on process safety incidents are written and presented by a third party who was not directly involved in the incident. As such, the papers may lack the human element and other insights that can only be properly appreciated and articulated by someone directly involved in the incident.
In his early career the author was involved in two major incidents while managing the day-to-day operation of refinery process units. This paper describes the first incident involving 2 major fires. A later paper (part two) will describe the second incident where several employees were rendered unconscious from exposure to sour gas. In both incidents the author found himself decidedly too close for comfort and could easily have become a casualty himself.
A series of operating incidents, two of which resulted in fires requiring the assistance of the external fire brigade, occurred on a process unit over a period of 7 hours. The first was a fire on the pre-heater which was diagnosed as a tube failure and the appropriate emergency procedure put into effect. The second, about 2 hours later, was a leaking flange joint under the main fractionating column, which did not ignite but was drenched with foam as a precautionary measure. The third occurred when the unit feed line was being depressurized and a cloud of escaping vapor ignited. This resulted in a ‘major fire’ being declared some 2 3/4 hours after the initial incident.
The content of this paper will raise awareness of lessons learned relating to a number of elements of Risk-Based Process Safety and human factors.