Deep, society-wide decarbonization is a grand challenge of the 21
st century, requiring the development, manufacture, and deployment of transformative carbon-neutral and carbon-negative technologies on a global scale. Carbon dioxide (CO
2) capture coupled with storage or utilization is projected to play a key role in mitigating and even reversing carbon emissions. Present-day carbon capture processes rely on thermochemical cycles where solvents/sorbents absorb and release CO
2 at lower and higher temperatures, respectively. While functional and available at commercial scale, these embodiments are energetically intensive and typically rely on fossil fuel derived heat for CO
2 desorption, ultimately limiting efficacy. Electrochemical approaches may enable lower energy CO
2 separations, as electrode potential can be modulated to selectively activate sorbents rather than temperature that impacts the entire capture media. Moreover, such systems may enable direct integration of renewables, modular deployment, and operation at (or near) ambient conditions.
To begin to close the gap in understanding the performance and costs of various capture platforms, we have developed modeling frameworks that enable system-level comparisons between conceptual electrochemical CO2 capture (eCCC) technologies and the incumbent thermochemical, amine-based capture technologies. With a focus on “4–stage” eCCC systems (i.e., comprising of an electrochemical reactor, absorption column, and flash tank), we integrate a reactive absorption model with a simplified electrochemical reactor model to predict the levelized cost of capture of each platform at the pilot plant scale. The model allows for an investigation of the property sets, operating parameters, and target cost factors that result in conditions where electrochemical systems compete with amine-scrubbing systems on an economic basis. Extending further, the model can be used to elucidate performance-determining relationships between constituent components, configurations, and operating envelopes of eCCC when capturing >1 Mtpa CO2. In addition, the conditions (i.e., gas flow rates, CO2 concentration, etc.) and scales where eCCC may be better suited to CO2 separation than existing technologies can be outlined. Ultimately, this modeling effort seeks to inform molecular and device engineering campaigns, providing researchers with a means of navigating the multi-dimensional design space.