The increasing volumes of wastewater present significant environmental challenges, including pollution and the loss of valuable resources. However, innovative approaches can transform this waste stream into valuable products (1). Given its substantial daily volume, wastewater represents an abundant and freely available feedstock for biorefineries. Among the potential products, Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) stand out due to their exceptional strength, conductivity, and versatility, making them essential materials in electronics, energy storage, and advanced composites (2). This study evaluates a bioprocess through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), investigating the conversion of 500,000 kg/hr of wastewater into CNTs and hydrogen. The process utilizes anaerobic digestion, biogas upgrading, biomethane pyrolysis, and CNT production stages, modeled in BioSTEAM.
The conducted research is part of a project supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the EPSCoR program to advance fundamental science for converting resources like waste and natural gas into carbon-free or carbon-negative hydrogen and valuable carbon materials, such as nanotubes, without significant CO₂ emissions. Previous studies on CNT synthesis have led to advanced catalytic growth (3), reduced structural damage (4), and nano tube length reduction methods (5). TEA and LCA have been conducted for various CNT production methods like pyrolysis and chemical vapor deposition and feedstocks such as plastic waste (6–8), However, using wastewater as a feedstock highlights a key novelty of this study.
The process yields more than 21,000 tonnes/year of CNTs and 8,400 tonnes/year of hydrogen. By selling hydrogen at $1 per kilogram, the minimum selling price of CNTs drops by $0.40/kg to $2.496/kg, allowing it to compete in the market. The TEA indicates a high Fixed Capital Investment, with the anaerobic digester accounting for the highest purchasing cost of $25M among the units. The LCA, conducted using openLCA, calculates a Global Warming Potential of 8.98 kg CO₂ eq/kg CNT, showing lower emissions than conventional CNT production methods. Normalized impacts also show negative values for wastewater sludge across categories like climate change, resource use, and human toxicity, indicating an overall environmental benefit. These findings suggest that the proposed bioprocess offers a pathway for sustainable CNT production, balancing economic feasibility with environmental benefits such as pollution reduction, resource recovery, and lower carbon emissions.
Future work will concentrate on sensitivity analysis to identify key variables, and refining CNT production techniques. These steps aim to strengthen the process’s practicality and scalability.
Acknowledgements:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding for the project from the National Science Foundation (NSF) with the NSF Award number 2218070.
References:
1. Obaideen K, Shehata N, Sayed ET, Abdelkareem MA, Mahmoud MS, Olabi AG. The role of wastewater treatment in achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) and sustainability guideline. Energy Nexus. 2022 Sep;7:100112.
2. Popov V. Carbon nanotubes: properties and application. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2004 Jan 15;43(3):61–102.
3. Briggs NM, Barrett L, Wegener EC, Herrera LV, Gomez LA, Miller JT, et al. Identification of active sites on supported metal catalysts with carbon nanotube hydrogen highways. Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 20;9(1):3827.
4. Guo J, Briggs N, Crossley S, Grady BP. A new finding for carbon nanotubes in polymer blends: Reduction of nanotube breakage during melt mixing. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2018 Jan;31(1):110–8.
5. Rhue MA, Zaqout M, Bavlnka C, Crossley S, Grady BP. Length reduction kinetics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes correlated to planetary ball mill impact energy. Fuller Nanotub Carbon Nanostructures. 2024 Jan 2;32(1):8–21.
6. Riley J, Atallah C, Siriwardane R, Stevens R. Technoeconomic analysis for hydrogen and carbon Co-Production via catalytic pyrolysis of methane. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2021 Jun;46(39):20338–58.
7. Griffiths OG, O’Byrne JP, Torrente-Murciano L, Jones MD, Mattia D, McManus MC. Identifying the largest environmental life cycle impacts during carbon nanotube synthesis via chemical vapour deposition. J Clean Prod. 2013 Mar;42:180–9.
8. Kim H, Nam E, An K, Lim H. Laboratory-scale plastic upcycling and green growth: Evaluating the upcycling of plastic waste into carbon nanotubes from economic and environmental aspects. Chem Eng J. 2024 Sep;495:153300.