2025 AIChE Annual Meeting
(234e) Reducing Dimensionality in Many-Objective Optimization for Planetary Boundary-Informed Sustainable Decision Making
Most of the current studies about PBs use life cycle assessment to calculate if PBs are transgressed or not. A typical approach is to assign a certain proportion of PB limits to a specific process, and to identify solutions that minimize the sum of transgressions over all PB’s considered. As an alternative approach, one could consider each planetary boundary metric as its own objective to be minimized and solving the resulting many-objective optimization problem (MaOP). Such an approach would give rigorous information about the tradeoffs between all planetary boundaries in the decision making space; however, such solutions are limited by the current state of the art in solving and interpreting MaOP’s. In this work, we seek to overcome these limitations by utilizing our novel objective reduction community algorithm (ORCA) to systematically reduce the high-dimensional MaOP with PB objectives to a 2-objective problem whereby correlating PB objectives are grouped together., thus preserving critical tradeoff information [4].
In this work, we apply the ORCA algorithm to a representative sustainable hydrogen supply chain design problem. This sustainable hydrogen supply chain model considers nine objectives, including cost and eight planetary boundary objectives associated with six Earth system processes (e.g., climate change, biogeochemical flows, land use). Our results show that key tradeoff structures are maintained in the reduced problem, allowing for identification of promising compromise solutions at Pareto frontier knee points. Namely, we identify renewable-powered electrolysis as the major driving force governing objective tradeoffs, as PB objectives that are aided by including this process (i.e. climate change, ocean acidification) are placed in a separate group from those that are hindered (i.e. land system change, freshwater use). Overall, this approach offers a scalable and interpretable framework for integrating planetary boundaries into optimization-based decision making and systematically assessing their tradeoffs and highlights the importance of dimensionality reduction methods in advancing sustainable system design.
[1] Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., ... & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society, 14(2).
[2] Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
[3] Ehrenstein, M., Galán-Martín, Á., Tulus, V., & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. (2020). Optimising fuel supply chains within planetary boundaries: A case study of hydrogen for road transport in the UK. Applied Energy, 276, 115486.
[4] Russell, Justin M., and Andrew Allman. "Sustainable decision making for chemical process systems via dimensionality reduction of many objective problems." AIChE Journal 69.2 (2023): e17962.