2025 AIChE Annual Meeting
(671a) Intensifying Blue Hydrogen Production from Bio-Ethanol Steam Reforming Via Pd-Ag-Y Membrane Reactor
C2H5OH + 3H2O <=> 2CO2 + 6H2 ΔH°298 = 157 kJ.mol⁻1 (Complete steam reforming)
Side reactions:
C2H5OH <=> CH3CHO + H2 ΔH°298 = 68.9 kJ.mol⁻1 (Dehydrogenation)
C2H5OH <=> C2H4 + H2O ΔH°298 = 45.5 kJ.mol⁻1 (Dehydration)
2C2H5OH <=> (C2H5)2O + H2O ΔH°298 = -24 kJ.mol⁻1 (Diethyl ether formation)
C2H4O <=> CH4 + CO ΔH°298 = -164.8 kJ.mol⁻1 (Acetaldehyde decomposition)
2C2H5OH <=> CH3COCH3 + CO + 6H2 ΔH°298 = 4.1 kJ.mol-1 (Acetone formation)
CO2 + H2 <=> CO + H2O ΔH°298 = 41.4 kJ.mol⁻1 (Reverse water gas shift reaction)
Coke formation reactions:
CH4 <=> C + 2H2 ΔH°298 = 74.9 kJ.mol⁻1 (Methane decomposition)
2CO <=> CO2 + C ΔH°298 = -172.6 kJ.mol⁻1 (Boudouard reaction)
C2H4 <=> C + 2H2 ΔH°298 = -52.3 kJ.mol⁻1 (Coke formation)
In contrast to conventional reactors, the BESR reaction can be efficiently carried out in a membrane reactor (MR), integrating reaction and separation within a single unit. This approach enables the in situ removal of hydrogen, shifting the reaction equilibrium toward higher conversion while mitigating undesirable side reactions and operating conditions. Among various membrane materials, palladium-based MRs are particularly advantageous due to their complete hydrogen selectivity. However, pure Pd membranes are susceptible to embrittlement and exhibit limited thermal and chemical stability [1,4]. Alloying Pd with metals such as Ag, Cu, Au, and Y has been investigated to enhance its performance. Specifically, the addition of Ag and Y has been shown to improve hydrogen permeability, structural stability, and resistance to degradation, making Pd-based alloys more viable for long-term operation in hydrogen separation and catalytic processes. In our previous study, the Pd-Ag-Y membrane showed one of the highest hydrogen permeability among other Pd-alloy membranes [5,6].
In this work, the performance of the Pd-Ag-Y MR will be investigated by performing the BESR reaction at different temperatures (300-500 °C) and pressures (2-5 bar). Both non-noble and noble catalysts, such as Co/CeO2 and Ru/CeO2 will be selected to be packed in the MR. The CeO2 support is selected for both catalysts to inhibit coke formation reactions. A simulated bioethanol mixture will be used for the reaction. In addition, the effect of different catalysts and several operating conditions will be analyzed in terms of conversion, hydrogen yield, recovery, and long-term stability. Finally, the pristine and used membranes will be characterized by a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD).
References
[1] O. Jazani, J. Bennett, S. Liguori, Carbon-low, renewable hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming in membrane reactors – a review, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification (2023) 109382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109382.
[2] O. Jazani, M. Adejumo, S. Liguori, Chapter 3 - Alcohol reforming processes in membrane reactors, in: A. Basile, K. Ghasemzadeh (Eds.), Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes, Elsevier, 2025: pp. 51–79.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13876-8.00008-2.
[3] O. Jazani, M. Adejumo, M.A. Elharati, S. Liguori, Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production via Ethanol Reforming Reactions in Membrane Reactors: Recent Advances and Future Directions, Energy & Fuels 38 (2024) 19992–20014. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02755.
[4] A. Yoosefdoost, O. Jazani, S. Liguori, A. Das, R.M. Santos, Toward Carbon-Negative Methanol Production from Biogas: Intensified Membrane Reactor, ChemCatChem n/a (2024) e202400698. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202400698.
[5] O. Jazani, M.A. Elharati, S. Liguori, Effects of porous supports and binary gases on hydrogen permeation in Pd–Ag–Y alloy membrane, J Memb Sci 713 (2025) 123327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123327.
[6] O. Jazani, J. Bennett, S. Liguori, Effect of temperature, air exposure and gas mixture on Pd82–Ag15–Y3 membrane for hydrogen separation, Int J Hydrogen Energy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.152