Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2025 AIChE Annual Meeting
- Computing and Systems Technology Division
- 10C: Planning and Operation of Energy Systems
- (710c) Harnessing Flexibility from Inflexible Systems: A Case Study in Electrolysis
To overcome these challenges, this work proposes to combine parallel electrochemical devices that operate using structured operating protocols of limited flexibility (e.g., periodic ON/OFF programs with different duty cycles). The key observation is that the use of structured operating protocols can help mitigation degradation, while the coordination of parallel protocols results in a mixing effect that enables a flexible total response signal. Using electrolysis systems as a case study, we formulate an optimization model that, given a family of predefined structured operating protocols, determines the optimal time-varying mixing of these protocols that maximizes total profit. Our findings show that the total profit obtained by mixing a sufficiently large number of devices converges to the optimal profit of a fully flexible device. Our studies explore behavior in different electricity markets (day-ahead and real-time markets) and under different types of structured protocols (e.g., triangular-wave protocols, squared-wave protocols, and bell-shaped/Gaussian protocols).
We also provide the mathematical justification of why mixing devices with structured protocols can help harness flexibility; specifically, we show that structured protocols can be seen as basis functions that, when mixed, enable the recovery of demand signals of any form. As such, our results pave the way to a new perspective on how to think about the design and operation of grid-connected devices.
(1) Mallapragada, D. S.; Dvorkin, Y.; Modestino, M. A.; Esposito, D. V.; Smith, W. A.; Hodge, B.-M.; Harold, M. P.; Donnelly, V. M.; Nuz, A.; Bloomquist, C.; Baker, K.; Grabow, L. C.; Yan, Y.; Rajput, N. N.; Hartman, R. L.; Biddinger, E. J.; Aydil, E. S.; Taylor, A. D. Decarbonization of the Chemical Industry through Electrification: Barriers and Opportunities. Joule 2023, 7 (1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.12.008.
(2) Wang, R.; Ma, J.; Sheng, H.; Zavala, V. M.; Jin, S. Exploiting Different Electricity Markets via Highly Rate-Mismatched Modular Electrochemical Synthesis. Nat. Energy 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01578-8.
(3) Mallapragada, D. S.; Junge, C.; Wang, C.; Pfeifenberger, H.; Joskow, P. L.; Schmalensee, R. Electricity Pricing Problems in Future Renewables-Dominant Power Systems. CEEPR.https://ceepr.mit.edu/workingpaper/electricity-pricing-problems-in-futu… (accessed 2025-01-25).
(4) Alia, S. M.; Stariha, S.; Borup, R. L. Electrolyzer Durability at Low Catalyst Loading and with Dynamic Operation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (15), F1164. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0231915jes.
(5) Jung, H. Y.; Jun, Y. S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Park, H. S.; Cho, S. K.; Jang, J. H. Effect of Ramping Rate on the Durability of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis During Dynamic Operation Using Triangular Voltage Cycling. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2024, 15 (2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2023.00948.
(6) Schofield, L.; Paren, B.; Macdonald, R.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Mallapragada, D. Dynamic Optimization of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers Considering Usage-Based Degradation. AIChE J. 2025, 71 (1), e18635. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18635.