Rutile oxides IrO
2 and RuO
2 are important catalysts for oxygen evolution and alkane oxidation. Using density functional theory (DFT) and temperature programmed desorption (TPD), we investigate binding properties of IrO
2-RuO
2 heterostructures to advance catalyst design. TPD measurements reveal N
2 binds 13 kJ mol
−1 more weakly on single-layer IrO
2/RuO
2 compared to multi-layer IrO
2, while O atoms show
24 kJ mol
−1 weaker binding. Conversely, on single-layer RuO
2/IrO
2, both N
2 and O atoms bind stronger (by 9 and
27 kJ mol
−1) than on multi-layer RuO
2, demonstrating significant subsurface influence. DFT calculations confirm these trends, showing N
2 binding strength follows: IrO
2 (−111 kJ mol
−1) > 1L-IrO
2/RuO
2 (−94 kJ mol
−1) > 1L-RuO
2/IrO
2 (−81 kJ mol
−1) > RuO
2 (−62 kJ mol
−1), while O atoms follow: 1L-RuO
2/IrO
2 (−124 kJ mol
−1) > IrO
2 (−109 kJ mol
−1) > RuO
2 (−103 kJ mol
−1) > 1L-IrO
2/RuO
2 (−93 kJ mol
−1). Studies of atomically mixed surfaces reveal binding energetics are primarily determined by the surface metal site and subsurface metals directly beneath it, with each Ir atom in subsurface positions strengthening binding by 8-10 kJ mol
−1. Our computational framework based on alchemy and entanglement decomposition shows when adsorbates bind, electron density shifts toward subsurface oxygen atoms. And thus, Replacing Ru with Ir at subsurface positions introduces higher positive charge that stabilizes this electron redistribution, strengthening binding. Notably, subsurface Ir enhances binding for both N
2 and O atoms, while surface metal sites have opposite effects—enhancing N
2 binding but weakening O binding. This research provides insights into engineering rutile oxide heterostructures to tune catalytic properties and offers a unified approach to understanding site and ligand effects in metal oxide catalysts.
