Aprotic alkali metal-O
2 batteries (Li, Na-O
2) have gained significant attention as next generation energy storage devices due to their high theoretical energy densities and reversible redox chemistries
1. Na-O
2 batteries are among the most promising candidates due to the kinetic stabilization of the sodium superoxide (NaO
2) phase on the cathode surface, resulting in low overpotentials during charge.
2,3 However, under cell resting conditions, disproportionation of the NaO
2 phase is observed due to the underlying processes at the NaO
2-electrolyte solvent interface
4. Strategies to mitigate this disproportionation include optimizing the electrolyte solvent-solute co-ordination to limit the interaction of the electrolyte solvent with the NaO
2 phase. However, such strategies provide limited fundamental insights into the elementary steps that dictate the disproportionation of the NaO
2 phase.
Herein, we investigate the impact of the solvation strength of the ether electrolyte solvent, governed by its molecular structure, on the disproportionation of the NaO2 phase formed at the cathode surface. Experimental electrochemical studies and detailed characterization such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), RAMAN spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are used to probe such effects by determining the variations in the NaO2 phase as a function of cell resting in different ether electrolyte solvents with varying solvation strengths. We find that the discharged NaO2 phase is the most stable in solvents with strong solute-solvent interactions. This results in relatively lower charge overpotentials and higher cell efficiencies compared to solvents with weak solute-solvent interactions, which lead to significant disproportionation of the NaO2 phase. To develop an understanding of the factors that govern the interactions between different ether electrolyte solvents and the NaO2 phase, theoretical calculations such as density functional theory (DFT) and Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) are used. These insights are critical for the rational design of sustainable and efficient Na-O2 batteries.
References:
1) Samira, S., et.al., ACS Energy Lett, 2021, 6 (2), 665-674.
2) Velinkar, K. K., et.al., ACS Energy Lett, 2023, 8 (11), 4555-4562.
3) Von Gunten, A., et.al., Chem. Mater., 2023, 35, 15, 5945-5952.
4) Kim, J., et.al., Nat Commun, 2016, 7 (1), 10670.