2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
(569fc) Multiple Chemical Looping Reforming (CLR) Reactors for Blue Hydrogen and Nitrogen Production
Chemical looping Reforming (CLR) has emerged as a viable alternative for blue hydrogen production. This process feeds air and fuel into separate reactors or stages, preventing the mixing of N2 and CO2. Consequently, CLR yields three distinct product streams: one N2-rich, another with a high syngas concentration, and a third consisting of CO2 and steam. The process utilizes oxygen carriers, which serve as oxygen transfer materials and catalysts for the reforming reactions. In a previous study, a model-based design of CLR fixed bed reactor was developed, simulated, and optimized for blue H2 and N2 production [3]. Under optimized conditions, this reactor yielded a product stream with a high hydrogen concentration (~66%) during reforming step (REF), achieving a 62% efficiency without further H2 purification. Furthermore, it generated high purity N2 (>98%) during the oxidation step (OX), paving the way for ammonia synthesis [4] – a potential hydrogen carrier. However, the fixed-bed reactor resulted in discontinuities in the downstream. Therefore, to achieve continuous production of H2 and N2, adopting a system comprising multiple reactors is considered here.
The investigation involves multi-reactor systems optimized at two different cycle times (OX-RED-REF): 150-135-200 sec and 200-200-200 sec. A key requirement for each system is to ensure a continuous supply of H2 and N2 with a minimum production rate of 300 kgH2/day. Under this constraint, the system with a 150-135-200 sec cycle time requires four reactors, allowing for potential overlap in each CLR stage. Meanwhile, the system with a 200-200-200 cycle time requires three reactors without CLR stages overlap. Both configurations are designed to generate three output streams: an N2 stream, a CO2 stream, and an H2 stream. Simulation results indicate that the three-reactor system achieves a smoother output flow and temperature across all three product streams compared to the four-reactor system. However, the three-reactor system exhibits a lower production rate (380-456 kgH2/day) than the four-reactor system (380-912 kgH2/day). The H2/N2 ratio in the three-reactor system has a small fluctuation around 1.0, whereas it fluctuates between 0.6 and 1.5 in the four-reactor system. Notably, both systems generate high-temperature product streams (925-950°C), presenting an opportunity for heat recovery, particularly in gas preheating and steam generation.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a DIKTI-funded Fulbright Fellowship and the Pratt & Whitney Institute of Advanced Systems Engineering (P&W-IASE) of the University of Connecticut. Any opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent those of the sponsor.
References
[1] US National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap. 2023.
[2] International Energy Agency, “Global Hydrogen Review 2023”, 2023.
[3] A. R. Irhamna and G. M. Bollas, “Process intensification in a fixed bed reactor for a small-scale process in the stranded assets,” in 33rd European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 2023, pp. 3043–3048.
[4] L. Burrows, P. X. Gao, and G. M. Bollas, “Thermodynamic feasibility analysis of distributed chemical looping ammonia synthesis,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 426, no. May, p. 131421, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131421.