2023 AIChE Annual Meeting
(377f) The Pore Space of Packed Bed Reactors: From Characterization to Improvements
Authors
Computational simulations represent powerful means to study packed bed reactors, devise, and test strategies for their improvements [5, 6]. A particularly important class of such reactors consists of randomly distributed porous pellets loaded with catalysts [1-4]. The spatial distribution of these pellets and their own pore structure are detrimental to the heat and mass transfer across the reactor. Thus, knowledge of the exact structure of the bed would benefit both computational and experimental researchers. While many models successfully simulate these systems without this information, pore-scale models have their unique advantages and capability to contribute to these ongoing improvement efforts [6]. At the same time, obtaining detailed information on the internal structure of a packed bed, and any porous material, requires the use of costly and not readily available techniques [6, 7].
In this work, we propose a method of determining the internal structure of a packed bed from inexpensive and easily obtainable laboratory and real-time process metrics. In particular, we use the average, bulk void fraction, hydraulic permeability, known pellet size, inlet and outlet feed temperatures, and product yields to obtain a statistically accurate description of the reactor structure. We use a combination of direct numerical simulations and an optimization algorithm to obtain an approximation of the reactor with spherical pellets that gives us the distribution of pore sizes, pore conductivities, and the fraction of open vs. closed pores. Equipped with this knowledge, we demonstrate potential avenues for process improvement that would not be accessible without a suitable representation of the pore space.
[1] Andrigo, P., Bagatin, R. and Pagani, G., 1999. Fixed bed reactors. Catalysis Today, 52(2-3), pp.197-221.
[2] Güttel, R. and Turek, T., 2016. Improvement of FischerâTropsch synthesis through structuring on different scales. Energy Technology, 4(1), pp.44-54.
[3] Zhou, D., Zhou, R., Zhou, R., Liu, B., Zhang, T., Xian, Y., Cullen, P.J., Lu, X. and Ostrikov, K.K., 2021. Sustainable ammonia production by non-thermal plasmas: Status, mechanisms, and opportunities. Chemical Engineering Journal, 421, p.129544.
[4] Haase, S., Tolvanen, P. and Russo, V., 2022. Process intensification in chemical reaction engineering. Processes, 10(1), p.99.
[5] Stegehake, C., Riese, J. and Grünewald, M., 2019. Modeling and Validating FixedâBed Reactors: A StateâofâtheâArt Review. ChemBioEng Reviews, 6(2), pp.28-44.
[6] Jurtz, N., Kraume, M. and Wehinger, G.D., 2019. Advances in fixed-bed reactor modeling using particle-resolved computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 35(2), pp.139-190.
[7] Chen, L., He, A., Zhao, J., Kang, Q., Li, Z.Y., Carmeliet, J., Shikazono, N. and Tao, W.Q., 2022. Pore-scale modeling of complex transport phenomena in porous media. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 88, p.100968.