2021 Annual Meeting
(586f) A Process Intensification Synthesis Framework for the Design of Divided Wall Columns
Authors
In this work, we present a process intensification synthesis approach for the design of divided wall columns based on recent extensions of the Generalized Modular Representation Framework [10-11]. A superstructure-based representation leveraging modular phenomenological building blocks is utilized to intensify the fundamental chemical performance (e.g., mass transfer, heat transfer) and to systematically generate novel process structures without pre-postulation of equipment design (including but not limited to divided wall columns). To accurately describe the possible liquid-vapor and liquid-liquid phase behaviors of the multi-component mixture, rigorous thermodynamic models (e.g., UNIQUAC) are explicitly incorporated in the synthesis model. The synthesis problem is formulated as a single mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem. The applicability and versatility of the proposed framework will be showcased via an industrial case study on methyl methacrylate purification by Dow Global Technologies [12]. Two new divided wall column designs are obtained, both of which can achieve equipment size reduction and substantial energy savings (Design 1: 18%, Design 2: 37%) compared to the original patent design. A two-column design is also generated which provides promising energy savings while needs to overcome the process bottleneck on product purity by incorporating membrane-assisted separation.
Reference
[1] Kiss, A. A. (2014). Distillation technology â Still young and full of breakthrough opportunities. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 89(4), 479-498.
[2] Tian, Y., Demirel, S. E., Hasan, M. M. F., & Pistikopoulos, E. N (2018). An overview of process systems engineering approaches for process intensification: State of the art. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 133, 160-210.
[3] DejanoviÄ, I., MatijaÅ¡eviÄ, L., & OlujiÄ, Ž. (2010). Dividing wall column â A breakthrough towards sustainable distilling. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 49(6), 559-580.
[4] Dünnebier, G., & Pantelides, C. C. (1999). Optimal design of thermally coupled distillation columns. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(1), 162-176.
[5] Caballero, J. A., & Grossmann, I. E. (2014). Optimal synthesis of thermally coupled distillation sequences using a novel MILP approach. Computers & chemical engineering, 61, 118-135.
[6] Ramirez-Corona, N., Jiménez-Gutiérrez, A., Castro-Agüero, A., & Rico-RamÃrez, V. (2010). Optimum design of Petlyuk and divided-wall distillation systems using a shortcut model. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 88(10), 1405-1418.
[7] Tula, A. K., Eden, M. R., & Gani, R. (2019). Computerâaided process intensification: Challenges, trends and opportunities. AIChE Journal, 66(1).
[8] Demirel, S. E., Li, J., El-Halwagi, M., & Hasan, M. F. (2020). Sustainable Process Intensification Using Building Blocks. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 8(48), 17664-17679.
[9] Pichardo, P., & Manousiouthakis, V. I. (2017). Infinite DimEnsionAl State-space as a systematic process intensification tool: Energetic intensification of hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 120, 372-395.
[10] Proios, P., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2005). Generalized modular framework for the representation and synthesis of complex distillation column sequences. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 44(13), 4656-4675.
[11] Tian, Y., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2018). Synthesis of operable process intensification systems â Steady-state design with safety and operability considerations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(15), 6049-6068.
[12] Jewell, D. W., Pendergast, J. G., & Worley, W. G. (2019). U.S. Patent No. 10,392,337. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.