2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
(510j) Playing (almost) safe on robustness and entropy in compressible multi-fluid dynamics with Geometry, Energy, and Entropy Compatible (GEEC) numerical schemes
However, application to what looks as "niche" problems shows that this dominant approach may not be as effective as generally accepted and has unduly benefited from a "winner-takes-all" effect. One of these problems is the simulation of isentropic flows which is actually "not-so-niche" as is of high practical interest, especially in multi-fluid systems which involve complex energy transfers.
The present contribution aims at providing some perspective on CFD numerical schemes recently designed in order to better capture isentropic flows including in multi-fluid systems. The basic principle is that isentropic flow is geometric, i.e. potential (or internal) energies only depend on fluids' densities which in turn are defined by fluid element trajectories. An isentropic numerical scheme can thus be obtained by a variational, least action principle. Corrections must be further added to enforce the important properties of energy conservation and positive dissipation. This Geometry, Energy, and Entropy Compatible approach (GEEC) is illustrated on our recently developed Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE, where the mesh moves and distorts according to user's free prescriptions) compressible multi-fluid scheme [Int. J. Multiph. Flow, accepted].
The critical ingredient in the GEEC approach is the action integral discretization as it entirely defines the numerical scheme except for some residual terms of higher than the scheme's order. Careful definition of the discrete action integral ensures that the eventual GEEC compressible multi-fluid ALE scheme has the following desirable properties:
i) Arbitrary number of coupled fluids;
ii) Versatile arbitrary grid evolution (ALE), possibly calculated from a Lagrangian velocity, for instance user-predefined or provided by added on-the-fly mesh regularization algorithms;
iii) Exact conservation of masses, momentum and energy;
iv) Second-order space-and-time discretization of grid velocity, and kinetic and internal energies;
v) First-order space-and-time discretization of transport (simple upwind scheme), acceptable for weak relative displacements, weak gradients, or large meshes, that provides proof of concept to study other higher-order variational direct ALE schemes;
vi) Yet, full preservation of isentropic flows to scheme order;
vii) Single pressure closure (full relaxation) between phases;
viii) Non-standard downwind pressure gradients, dual to upwind transport, unexpected and at variance with usual finite volumes schemes.
The scheme was tested on various strenuous situations, including a supersonic crossing of eight Gaussian clouds on a shrink-then-stretch swirling ALE grid to be presented.