2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
(399f) Comprehensive Dynamic Simulation Model of a Cryogenic Storage Tank
Authors
Several studies in the past have attempted to simulate cryogenic tanks using either simplified lumped parameter models or complex full-fledged CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) models. While the latter are computationally too expensive for practical applications (Saleem et al., 2018), most of the former lack the rigor. Most models (Migliore et al, 2015) assume vapor and liquid phases to be in Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium (VLE), which is not the reality (Effendy et al., 2017; Migliore et al., 2017) in an industrial tank. Process simulators such as Aspen Hysys® and Unisim® have inbuilt tank modules for dynamic simulation, but with serious limitations. These lumped parameter models cannot predict spatial temperature and pressure gradients, do not allow independent non-equilibrium initial hold-up conditions, have no provisions for some heat leaks, and have non-intuitive ways to deal with mixing in the tank. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop a simpler, faster, and more rigorous dynamic simulation model for this heart of most energy systems.
Modeling the spatiotemporal behavior of a cryogenic storage tank poses two key challenges. One is the handling of the moving vapor-liquid interface, and the other is the accurate prediction of the BOG generation rate. While many existing models consider only the evaporation, condensation cannot be ignored. In a multicomponent system, some components may evaporate, and others may condense at the same time. In this work, we will present a practically useful, comprehensive, and spatiotemporal mathematical model for simulating the dynamic behavior of a generic cylindrical tank holding a multi-component cryogenic liquid. The tank can be completely or partially insulated and allows multiple feed and product streams. The model uses a novel, flexible, and moving spatial grid instead of the fixed grid used in most models and CFD. It does not assume well-mixed liquid and vapor phases and allows non-equilibrium behavior. It also offers a practically meaningful and intuitive treatment for mixing feeds with the tank contents and withdrawing products. It models evaporation/condensation at the vapor-liquid interface using appropriate driving forces based on sound interphase mass transfer principles. The mass, energy, and component balances describing the spatiotemporal variations of pressure, temperature, and composition in the vapor and liquid holdups result in a complex differential algebraic (DAE) equation system. The system is further reduced using clever mathematical manipulations to improve solution speed. The solution requires repeated iterative and nonlinear vapor-liquid equilibrium or flash calculations that need accurate physical properties. For these, we have designed a series of ANN (Artificial Neural Network) models with help from Aspen Hysys to reduce computational burden without sacrificing accuracy in physical property estimation. Our simulation model can predict the dynamic behavior of any cryogenic storage tank in any mode of operation (loading, unloading, supplying, etc.) It estimates BOG generation accurately by capturing the effect of competitive multi-component evaporation and condensation occurring at the interface. The developed model is thus computationally cheaper and comprehensive in capturing all major tank dynamics. It provides a sound basis for the design, operation, and control of these tanks.
References
Saleem, et al., A CFD simulation study of boiling mechanism and BOG generation in a full-scale LNG storage
tank, Comput. Chem. Eng. 115 (2018) 112â120.
Migliore, C. Tubilleja, V. Vesovic, Weathering prediction model for stored liquefied natural gas (LNG), J. Nat.
Gas Sci. Eng. 26 (2015) 570â580.
Migliore, A. Salehi, V. Vesovic, A non-equilibrium approach to modelling the weathering of stored Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG), Energy 124 (2017) 684â692.
Effendy, et al., Dynamic modelling and optimization of an LNG storage tank in a regasification terminal with
semi-analytical solutions for N2-free LNG, Comput. Chem. Eng. 99 (2017) 40â50.