2018 AIChE Annual Meeting
(734b) Dynamic Modeling and Control of a Post-Combustion Solid-Sorbent Capture System with the Ccsi Models and Tools
Authors
The post-combustion carbon capture flowsheet was developed in Aspen Custom Molder (ACM) and was constructed using the CCSI bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) model1. The model is one-dimensional with two-phases and an integrated heat-exchanger that is flexible over a wide-range of operating conditions so that it can represent both adsorption and regeneration in either a steady-state or dynamic framework. A dynamic flowsheet was developed that is based on an optimal steady-state design that includes a three stage BFB for CO2 adsorption, a two stage BFB regenerator, and includes a crossflow heat exchanger between the rich and lean solid streams. The flowsheet also accounts for the pressure flow dynamics and downcomers in the BFB.
The integrated model is computationally expensive and not suitable for direct use in an NMPC framework, hence a reduced order model is required for model-based control. The CCSI data-driven system identification tool, D-RM Builder,2 is used to generate computationally efficient dynamic reduced-order models from a set of transient data. D-RM Builder allows for the selection of input/output variables, the generation of a sequence of step-changes, and interfaces with rigorous modeling platforms, such as ACM, to automatically run and collect step-test data. This tool was used to generate a computationally efficient nonlinear Decoupled A-B Net (DABNet) model3 involving multiple time-scales corresponding to âfastâ pressure-flow dynamics and âslowerâ temperature-composition transients. The DABNet model was used as the control model in CCSIâs Advanced Process Control (APC) Framework4,5. The APC Framework solves the constrained NMPC problem in a computationally efficient manner utilizing âfastâ analytical derivative evaluations, implementing the control moves on the rigorous ACM flowsheet model. The control strategy is tested and compared to traditional control for its servo control and disturbance rejection characteristics.
References
- Lee, A., & Miller, D. C. (2012). A one-dimensional (1-d) three-region model for a bubbling fluidized-bed adsorber. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(1), 469-484.
- Ma, J., Mahapatra, P., Zitney, S. E., Biegler, L. T., & Miller, D. C. (2016). D-RM Builder: A software tool for generating fast and accurate nonlinear dynamic reduced models from high-fidelity models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 94, 60-74.
- Sentoni, G. B., Biegler, L. T., Guiver, J. B., & Zhao, H. (1998). Stateâspace nonlinear process modeling: Identification and universality. AIChE Journal, 44(10), 2229-2239.
- Omell, B. P., Ma, J., Mahapatra, P., Yu, M., Lee, A., Bhattacharyya, D., Zitney, S., Biegler, L., & Miller, D. C. (2016). Advanced Modeling and Control of a Solid Sorbent-Based CO2 Capture Process. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(7), 633-638.
- Mahapatra, P., Ma, J. & Zitney, S.E. (2018). Nonlinear Model Predictive Control using Decoupled A-B Net Formulation for Carbon Capture Systems â Comparisons with Algorithmic Differentiation Approach. American Control Conference, Jun 27-29, Milwaukee, WI.