2018 AIChE Annual Meeting
(583b) Design and Intensification of Sorption-Enhanced Reaction Processes for Methanol Production
Authors
The objective of this work is to counter currently-existing process inefficiencies by enhancing single-pass reaction conversions and preventing catalyst deactivation. To this end, we apply the sorption enhanced reaction process (SERP) concept for designing a periodic sorption-enhanced methanol synthesis (SE-MeOH) process from syngas; in-situ removal of water byproduct favorably shifts the equilibrium towards enhanced methanol synthesis in accordance with the Le Chatelierâs principle. For capturing the dynamics of the SE-MeOH process, we use the generalized adsorption-reaction modeling and simulation (GRAMS) platform. GRAMS is based on a one-dimensional, pseudo-homogeneous, non-isothermal, non-adiabatic, and non-isobaric NAPDE-based model, and has been extensively validated with experimental data for several SERP case studies [5]. GRAMS is coupled with an in-house simulation-based constrained grey-box optimizer for optimizing SE-MeOH process cycle configuration, design parameters and operating conditions [6][7]. We obtain single-pass carbon conversions as high as 80% in the Lurgi-type Methanol reactor via SE-MeOH with production capacity exceeding 109500 tons/yr, which is the typical capacity of an industrial plant [8]. The developed SE-MeOH process has smaller carbon footprint, enhanced product quality, and smaller reactor, condenser and recompressor size leading to significant savings in energy consumption and process economics. This presentation also covers the integration of the developed SE-MeOH process with a steam methane reforming reactor unit for converting natural gas to methanol via syngas route.
References
[1] G.A. Olah, Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 2636â2639.
[2] A. Cybulski, Liquid-phase methanol synthesis: catalysts, mechanism, kinetics, chemical equilibria, vapor-liquid equilibria, and modelingâA Review, Catal. Rev. Eng. 36 (1994) 557â615.
[3] A. V Kruglov, Methanol synthesis in a simulated countercurrent moving-bed adsorptive catalytic reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 49 (1994) 4699â4716.
[4] M. Kuczynski, M.H. Oyevaar, R.T. Pieters, K.R. Westerterp, Methanol synthesis in a countercurrent gasâsolidâsolid trickle flow reactor. An experimental study, Chem. Eng. Sci. 42 (1987) 1887â1898.
[5] A. Arora, S.S. Iyer, M.M.F. Hasan, GRAMS: A General Framework Describing Adsorption, Reaction and Sorption-Enhanced Reaction Processes, Submitted. (2018).
[6] A. Arora, I. Bajaj, S.S. Iyer, M.M.F. Hasan, Optimal Synthesis of Periodic Sorption Enhanced Reaction Processes with Application to Hydrogen Production, Comput. Chem. Eng. 115 (2018) 89â111.
[7] I. Bajaj, S.S. Iyer, M.M.F. Hasan, A Trust Region-based Two Phase Algorithm for Constrained Black-box and Grey-box Optimization with Infeasible Initial Point, Comput. Chem. Eng. (2017).
[8] N. Rezaie, A. Jahanmiri, B. Moghtaderi, M.R. Rahimpour, A comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous dynamic models for industrial methanol reactors in the presence of catalyst deactivation, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 44 (2005) 911â921.