2013 AIChE Annual Meeting

(219l) Process Intensification: Spinning Disc Reactor Technology for TiO2 Nanoparticles Production

Authors

Mohammadi, S. - Presenter, Newcastle University
Boodhoo, K., Newcastle University
Harvey, A. P., Newcastle University



Process intensification: Spinning
disc reactor technology for TiO2 nanoparticles production

Somaieh Mohammadi*,
Kamelia V.K. Boodhoo, Adam P. Harvey

School of Chemical
Engineering & Advanced Materials,

Newcastle University,
Merz Court,

Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE1 7RU, UK

Corresponding author:
s.mohammadi@ncl.ac.uk

Tel: +44 191 222 7169

Fax: +44 191 222 5292

Abstract

An in-depth
study of TiO2 precipitation has been performed on a spinning disc reactor
(SDR). Effects of physical parameters such as rotational speed, surface texture
and size, and operating parameters such as flowrate, ratio of precursor to
water and location of feed introduction points were studied.

Samples
collected from the disc were subjected to dynamic light scattering (DLS) to
quantify the particle sizes and particle size distribution. At higher disc
rotational speeds, particles with sizes close to 1 nm and with a narrow
particle size distribution (PSD) were formed due to the high disc speeds, the
thin films formed on the surface of SDRs experience high mixing intensity and a
high degree of plug flow. Smaller particles with a narrower PSD were obtained
using the grooved disc texture because the grooved disc is more effective at ensuring
plug flow behaviour compared to a smooth disc under the same operating
conditions.

Smaller
particles and narrower particle size distributions were achieved by introducing
the titanium tetra isopropoxide (TTIP) precursor into the water film away from
the centre which allows better mixing between the two streams.  

1.       Introduction

Most
pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals are produced in stirred tank reactors. The
degree of heat/mass transfer and mixing of stirred vessels is reduced at larger
scales because the surface to volume ratio decreases and the distribution time
of contents increases, whilst the corresponding mixing intensity decreases at
invariable stirrer speed. Accordingly, large vessels tend to inhibit reactions,
which may be inherently rapid and highly exothermic.

The SDR is
regarded as a key process intensification (PI) development in chemical
production. Such PI significantly decreases the scale of the production
process, which can lead to a smaller and simpler plant, lower material costs,
lower waste, improved temperature control, excellent heat transfer and a safer
process [1].

The fluid
residence times in a SDR are in the range of a few seconds compared with a few
hours in a stirred tank. The SDR generates higher mixing intensity than a
stirred vessel and should consequently be capable of retaining uniform
concentration profiles within a fast reacting fluid. Therefore, better control
would be applied over the reaction path than that possible in a conventional
stirred vessel. Considering the pharmaceutical industry's drive to cut down
production times, the SDR, with its high potential productive capacity, may
allow laboratory-scale or pilot-scale vessels to achieve the same production
levels as full scale vessels, thereby preventing delays in validating various
levels of scale-up. Small reactor holdup (<100 mL) and tighter fluid
temperature control make the SDR suitable for highly hazardous reactions [2].

The high
mixing intensity within the liquid film, enhanced by waves and ripples on the
interface, means that it is attractive for homogeneous reactions such as
crystallisation and precipitation. An important aspect of employing SDR as the
apparatus of choice, for precipitation production of nanoparticles, is the
micromixing time, which needs to be very short to ensure that homogeneous
nucleation dominates [3]. The micromixing [4] and macromixing [5] in SDR films have been studied recently. The SDR behaves as
a plug flow reactor at a wide range of rotational speeds and flowrates [5]. A plug flow crystalliser provides
excellent productive crystallisation methodology and a consistent product
quality (narrow particle size distribution). PI techniques might facilitate
better methods of precipitation of TiO2 and other products, as
demonstrated by the precipitation of barium sulphate on a spinning disc, which
yielded significantly smaller crystals than the batch technique [6]. The main factor controlling this was the
very high rates of mixing on the spinning disc, which led to the rapid
depletion of supersaturation, and much higher nucleation rates. Cafiero et al.
[6] also demonstrated that the energy input in
the spinning disc process was much lower than the use of a T-mixer arrangement,
suggesting that operating costs would also be reduced along with better control
of crystal size.

Nanosized TiO2
represents a promising research subject for various modern fields of science
and technology, including nanobiotechnology and fundamental medicine [7]. Nevertheless, the synthesis and
stabilisation of nanodispersed forms of TiO2 are challenges for
industry and better methods of production are required. Therefore, the
intention of this study is to determine the experimental conditions for which
consistent product quality for TiO2 particle formation prevails in the spinning
disc reactor.

2.       Materials
and Methods

To characterize and predict
experimentally the performance of the SDR, TiO2 precipitation
experiments were performed on a 30 cm stainless steel rotating disc. Smooth and
grooved disc (8 concentric grooves) textures were studied.

The schematic
set up of the rig is illustrated in Figure 1(a).

Titanium
Tetra Iso Propoxide (TTIP) (the precursor) and acidified water (pH = 1.5) were
introduced to the surface of the disc at 50C.  TTIP was
injected into the water film at 3 different radial positions: centre of the
disc; 5 cm distance to centre and 10 cm away from the centre as shown in Figure
1(b).

Figure
1. (a) Schematic setup of experiment, (b) top view of disc, showing TTIP stream
injection positions

3.       Results
and Discussion

Figure 2
shows the effect of rotational speed on particle size and particle size
distribution on both the smooth and grooved discs. It can be seen that at
higher disc speeds that narrower size distribution and smaller particles are
achieved. Higher disc speeds cause strong shearing forces and produce a thin
layer of the reagent solution, which results in uniform heat transfer and
homogenous concentration fields throughout the entire reaction mixture. An
increase in rotational speed also increases the intensity of surface waves and
promotes transverse mixing across the film thickness, thus achieving a more
uniform velocity profile at any given radial position. Consequently, after
nucleation, all the particles have very similar growth conditions, resulting in
narrower size distribution of the nanoparticles. Figure 2 also indicates that
at identical operating conditions, a grooved disc leads to production of
smaller and narrower particle sizes. A grooved disc is more effective at
establishing plug flow than a smooth disc. This has been attributed to
continuous film detachment and reattachment on the grooved disc which enhances
turbulence in the film [5].

Figure
2. Effect of rotational speed and disc texture on particle size distribution

The effect of
feed entry position on the particle size and distribution is shown in Figure 3.
By injecting the TTIP at increasing distances from the centre, smaller
particles and narrower particle sizes can be produced.  It is probable
that there is better mixing within the outer section of the disc because of
increased shear rate as the film thins out towards the edges. It is expected
that nucleation rates were higher and more uniform throughout the film in this
highly mixed environment, giving smaller particles with narrower PSDs.
Moreover, with injection further way from the centre, the residence time of the
mixed fluid stream is shorter. This is also likely to contribute to reducing
the extent of growth of the particles, resulting in smaller particles.

Figure 3. Effect of
feed location on particle size distribution on smooth disc

4.       Conclusion

In this work,
it has been shown that the intensified processing of TiO2
precipitation under high centrifugal fields on the spinning disc reactor offers
advantages as, in the ciorrect conditions, production of very small (1-2
nm)particles with a very narrow PSD is possible.

At a
rotational speed of 1200 rpm on a 30 cm diameter smooth disc with the feed pipe
(feeding TTIP) 10cm from the centre, particles of  below 1 nm diameter
were obtained.  Under the same conditions the grooved disc produced even
smaller particle sizes than the smooth disc and with narrower distribution.

This intensified method of
production of TiO2 particles represents a viable way forward to
continuous, industrial production of such an important chemical.

5.      
References

1.           
Reay, D., Ramshaw, C., Harvey, A., Process Intensification, engineering for efficiency,
sustainability and flexibility
. 2008: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd

2.           
Pask, S.D., O. Nuyken, and Z.Z. Cai, The spinning disk reactor: an example
of a process intensification technology for polymers and particles.
Polymer
Chemistry, 2012. 3(10): p. 2698-2707.

3.           
Nielson, A.E., Homogeneous Nucleation in Barium Sulfate Precipitation.
Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 1961. 15: p. 441-442.

4.           
Boodhoo, K.V.K. and S.R. Al-Hengari, Micromixing Characteristics in a
Small-Scale Spinning Disk Reactor.
Chemical Engineering & Technology,
2012. 35(7): p. 1229-1237.

5.           
Mohammadi, S. and K.V.K. Boodhoo, Online conductivity measurement of
residence time distribution of thin film flow in the spinning disc reactor.

Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012. 207: p. 885-894.

6.           
Cafiero, L.M., et al., Process intensification: Precipitation of barium
sulfate using a spinning disk reactor.
Industrial & Engineering
Chemistry Research, 2002. 41(21): p. 5240-5246.

7.           
Chen, X. and S.S. Mao, Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis,
properties, modifications, and applications.
Chemical Reviews, 2007. 107(7):
p. 2891-2959.