(600co) Similarities and Differences Between NHC- and Pincer Nickel Complex-Catalyzed CO2 Transformations Into Methanol: Mechanistic Insight From DFT Calculations

Similarities
and Differences between NHC- and Pincer Nickel Complex-Catalyzed CO₂
Transformations into Methanol: Mechanistic Insight from DFT Calculations

Fang Huang and Zhi-Xiang Wang*

Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing,100049,
China

zxwang@gucas.ac.cn

Keywords: Catalytic CO₂ transformation, Methanol,
DFT mechanistic study

Abstract: The transformation of CO₂ into
value-added compounds such as methanol is a promising strategy to utilize the
abundant and cheap CO₂ resource. Recently, Zhang et al.^[1]
used N-hetrocyclic carbene (NHC) as the catalyst and silanes as hydrogen sources
to convert CO₂ into methanol. Guan el al. ^[2] employed the
pincer nickel complex (^tBuPCPNiH, [Ni]H) as
the catalyst and catecholborane (HBcat) as hydrogen source to transform CO₂
into methanol. The two reactions represent the first example for such a transformation
in the organic and organometallic catalysis, respectively. Using DFT
calculations, we ^[3-4] gained insight into how the two catalytic transformations
take place. Interestingly, in spite of the different catalysts, the two transformations
share similarities. Both transformations utilize three steps to transfer H^d- to CO₂ or CO₂-containing
intermediate species step and step. However, the H^d- transfer mechanisms are different. [Ni]H catalyst uses
'lending and then borrowing" strategy to transfer H^d- from hydrogen source (HBcat) to CO₂/HCOOBcat/CH₂O,
while NHC pushes/facilitates the direct H^d- transfer from hydrogen source (silane) to CO₂/HCOO[Si]/CH₂O.
[Ni]H catalyst itself, as a reactant, participates in the each reaction step and
then retrieves as the transformation proceeds. In contrast, NHC catalyst never
changes its integrity in the transformation process. Because of the similarities
and different H^d--transfer mechanisms, the mechanistic details are
different, as illustrated by Figure 1(B). According to the mechanistic details,
we give suggestions on how to develop effective catalysts to realize such transformation.

Figure 1: A) Two experimental transformations.
B) Similarities and differences
between the two transformations.

References:

[1]    Riduan, S. N.; Zhang, Y. G.; Ying J. Y.: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3322.

[2]    Chakraborty, S.; Zhang, J.; Krause, J. A.; Guan, H. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8872.

[3]    Huang, F.; Lu, G.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Wang Z.-X.: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
12388.

[4]  Huang F.; Zhang, C. G.; Jiang, J. L.; Wang, Z. X.  Inorg. Chem.
2011, 50, 3816.

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­