Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2012 AIChE Annual Meeting
- Liaison Functions
- Undergraduate Research Forum
- (59e) Exergetic Analysis of Chemical Looping Reforming
Beyond CLC, several chemical looping reforming (CLR) technologies have also been identified. For instance, the use of steam instead of air as the oxidant has been demonstrated by our group and others to yield an efficient route produce high-purity H2 as the oxidizer effluent. Similarly, our group has recently proposed the use of CO2 instead of air as the oxidant, resulting in chemical looping dry reforming (CLDR) as an novel method to utilize CO2 via reduction to CO (i.e. via “CO2 activation”). While the thermodynamic and kinetic feasibility was demonstrated for these chemical looping reforming processes, their exergetic efficiency has not been studied to-date.
In the present work, we have developed a process model for CLR processes and implemented it in the Aspen modeling software. First results from these studies to-date indicate an increased exergetic efficiency of chemical looping dry reforming (CLDR) compared to conventional dry reforming. Extension onto H2 production via CLR processes and comparison to conventional H2 production via steam reforming and partial oxidation is currently under way.