III.
Results and Discussions
https://proceedings.aiche.org/sites/default/files/aiche-proceedings/con…" height="264" class="documentimage">Two
different particle geometries were fabricated using a casting and mechanical
stretching method that was described earlier. Parameters used for the manufacturing
and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the resulting geometries
are given in Table 1 and Fig. 1, respectively. Representative images of the
bacteriabots with different geometries are depicted in Fig. 2. The 2D image tracking
routine was utilized to characterize the motion of the BacteriaBots. Of
particular interest is how the body geometry will affect the directionality of
the motion of BacteriaBot without the need for active steering. Directionality
is defined as the ratio of the magnitude of the displacement vector to the
total distance traveled. To prove that the bacteria attached to the mobile microbeads are
the source of propulsion, a control experiment was performed. Minimal displacement
of the control bead confirms that the bacteria attached to the mobile
microbeads are the main source of propulsion. Therefore, any directed movement
observed for this control bead would be neither due to diffusion nor due to the
flow field generated by the free- swimming bacteria present in the background.
The experimental results for directionality of the bacteria-
https://proceedings.aiche.org/sites/default/files/aiche-proceedings/con…" height="243" class="documentimage">propelled bodies with
spherical, barrel, and football-shaped geometries are shown in Fig. 3. It
can be seen that the barrel and football shaped bodies are propelled with a
higher degree of directionality compared to the spherical robots. Two
representative trajectories of the BacteriaBots are shown in Fig. 4. Number of attached bacteria for all geometries varies
between 1-6; however, our experimental results do not seem to be significantly
dependent upon the number of bacteria attached. This is consistent with our
previous observations if the attached bacteria are uniformly distributed over
the body, the overall force is expected to remain largely unchanged regardless
of the number of attached bacteria [7].
https://proceedings.aiche.org/sites/default/files/aiche-proceedings/con…" height="220" class="documentimage">
https://proceedings.aiche.org/sites/default/files/aiche-proceedings/con…" height="225" class="documentimage">
It
should be noted that more than the number of bacteria attached to the
microbead, the location of attachment is expected to affect the overall
behavior. If the areal attachment density becomes significantly nonuniform, we
expect to see a change in the average net resultant force and consequently
observe a change in overall speed and directionality [3].
IV.
Conclusion
Variation in
motile behavior of BacteriaBots due to their body geometry can be very complex
and can only be determined experimentally. These complexities are due to: (1)
non-spherical geometries have varying coefficients of drag depending on their
aspect ratio and the direction of motion, and (2) the varying radius of curvature
on the surface of non-spherical geometries leads to preferential bacterial
adhesion in certain locations. By utilizing a high throughput PS micro-particle
manufacturing method, we characterized the motile behavior of BacteriaBots with
spherical, barrel and football shaped bodies. It was shown that for
BacteriaBots with uniform areal attachment density, body shape strongly affects
the directionality of the motion.
We are currently examining the
behavior of other geometrical shapes such as bullets. We are also investigating
if the particles size will have an impact on the observed trend.
Acknowledgment
The
authors would like to thank Professor Birgit Scharf in Biological Sciences
Department at Virginia Tech for gifting the bacteria. This work was in part
supported by the National Science Foundation (IIS-117519).
References
[1] B. Behkam, M. Sitti, "Bacteria Integrated
Swimming Micro-robots", in M. Lungarella, et al., (eds.), 50 years of AI,
Festschrift, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intellignece 4850, pp. 154-163, 2007.
[2] S. Martel, et al.,
"Controlled manipulation and actuation of micro-objects with magnetotactic
bacteria," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, pp. 233904-233904-3,
2006.
[3] A. A. Julius, M. S. Sakar, E. Steager,
U. K. Cheang, M. Kim, V. Kumar,and G. J. Pappas, ?Harnessing bacterial power
for micro scale manipulation and locomotion,? IEEE International Conference on
Robotics and Automation (IEEE, Kobe, Japan, 2009).
[4] D. B. Weibel, et al.,
"Microoxen: Microorganisms to move microscale loads," Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol.
102, p. 11963, 2005.
[5] B. Behkam and M. Sitti, "Bacterial
flagella-based propulsion and on/off motion control of microscale
objects," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, p. 023902, 2007.
[6] B. Behkam and M. Sitti, "Effect of
quantity and configuration of attached bacteria on bacterial propulsion of
microbeads," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, p. 223901, 2008.
[7] M. A. Traoré, et al.,
"Computational and experimental study of chemotaxis of an ensemble of
bacteria attached to a microbead," Physical Review E, vol. 84, p.
061908, 2011.
[8] B. Behkam and M. Sitti,
"Characterization of bacterial actuation of micro-objects," Proceedings
of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2009, pp. 1022-1027.
[9] J. A. Champion, et al.,
"Making polymeric micro-and nanoparticles of complex shapes," Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, p. 11901, 2007.