Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2011 Annual Meeting
- Materials Engineering and Sciences Division
- Hydrogel Biomaterials I
- (651f) Inherent Mechanical Gradients In 3D Matrigel Cultures Influence Tumor Cell Behaviors
Whereas the bulk hydrogel modulus does not vary, in regions close to the rigid support (i.e., glass), edge effects create an inherent gradient in mechanical stiffness that varies between that of the support and the hydrogel. A finite element model was employed to confirm the presence of varying mechanical environments in 3D cultures. To investigate GBM response to these environments, patient derived GBMs (OSU-2) were encapsulated in different concentrations of Matrigel (40, 55, 70, 85 % v/v). In particular, we examined cell morphology and spreading, intracellular morphology (actin organization) and migration capacity of OSU-2 cells at the lowest gel positions and highest gel positions. OSU-2 cells close to the bottom of the substrate showed highly elongated, bipolar morphologies and had statistically different cell areas compared with those more distant from the rigid support, which showed mostly rounded morphologies (with short processes in some cases). This was also reflected in actin organization, with actin filaments being highly organized and forming stress fibers in cells close to the substrate whereas those nearer to the gel surface displayed poorly defined actin architecture. OSU-2 cells also migrated at significantly higher speeds close to the bottom of substrate in a mesenchymal fashion displaying long processes compared to those nearer to the gel surface that migrated more slowly while displaying rounded or ellipsoid cell bodies with short processes. This system is, by far, one of the simplest systems to study the influence of stiffness gradients on the behavior of tumor cells in a single 3D hydrogel system and also provides insights as to how far cells can “sense” their microenvironments in 3D.
References:
[1] D. E. Discher et al., Science. 2005. 310; 1139-43.
[2] S. Sant et al., The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2010.88; 899-911.
[3] P. Y. Wen et al., N Engl J Med. 2008. 359 (5); 492-507.