Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2011 Annual Meeting
- Separations Division
- Membranes for Hydrogen Purification
- (386f) A Modeling Study of Different Membrane Process Schemes and Spiral-Wound Module Flow Configurations for Hydrogen Purification
The membrane mentioned previously, which is a thin-film composite membrane can potentially be manufactured as a flat-sheet membrane and spirally wound over a central perforated tube. Such a spiral-wound module configuration has been traditionally used for reverse osmosis and pervaporation applications in a cross-current mode without a sweep gas. However, a spiral-wound module capable of handling a sweep gas can be found in the patent literature [1]. Such a module can be used in both cross-current as well as countercurrent modes.
This study involves the modeling of the aforementioned spiral-wound module in both the membrane separator as well as the membrane reactor modes. The modeling has taken into account material and energy balances. 1-D model countercurrent flow calculations were performed in MATLAB using the bvp4c solver while the 2-D cross-current calculations were performed in COMSOL Multiphysics, a simulation software which utilizes the finite element technique. Although it is expected that countercurrent flow between feed and sweep streams would provide a greater average driving force for separation and reduce the membrane area, the calculations have shown that the effect of flow mode becomes more important for the membrane separator under lower driving force across the membrane or lower sweep to feed molar ratios. In case of the membrane reactor, the flow mode affects the separation and reaction more intricately due to its simultaneous effects on both the heat and mass transfer driving forces. Temperature and concentration profiles and membrane areas have been quantified and compared for the two flow modes under various operating conditions.
Reference:
[1] D. Reddy, S. Ramon, T.Y. Moon, C.E. Reineke, Counter current dual-flow spiral wound dual-pipe membrane separation, U.S. Patent, 5,034,126 (1991).