NO
x removal by selective catalytic reduction (SCR) has been studied extensively by the exhaust aftertreatment community. Cu-zeolites, especially Cu on ZSM-5, have been found to be particularly well suited for low temperature SCR [1]. Despite a large body of research on Cu-ZSM-5, the debate about the active Cu species is still ongoing. Our recent measurements of the Cu X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectra (XANES) in a custom-built,
operando reactor using glassy carbon tubes have produced intriguing results.
In situ XANES spectra were collected over a range of Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts, from loadings of 1-7 wt.% Cu, under NO oxidation, dry SCR, wet SCR and pure ammonia gas conditions and a 2.7 wt.% Cu was tested
operando under wet and dry NO oxidation and wet SCR reaction conditions. During NO oxidation, the Cu was split between isolated Cu
2+ species and Cu
2+ in the form of bulk-like CuO, present in small amounts at lower loadings and becoming the dominant species at high loadings where the Cu over-exchange was around 300%. Nevertheless, the Cu was fully oxidized. Upon the introduction of the reducing agent, ammonia, for both dry and wet SCR conditions, a significant portion of Cu reduced to its 1+ oxidation state. Similar to the Cu
2+, however, this 1+ species was an isolated Cu
1+, entirely different from the Cu
1+ found in bulk Cu
2O. In fact, there was never any identifiable amount of Cu
1+ in a bulk-like Cu
2O form during any phase of our experiments. Lower Cu wt.% loadings (50-100% exchanged) had higher proportions of reduced Cu where the lowest Cu loading showed the presence of very little Cu
2+. The amount of reduced Cu
1+ ranged from 5-70% going from high to low Cu loadings. Furthermore, at low weight loadings, some Cu
2+ was identified as Cu coordinated with NH
3 where the higher wt.% Cu samples appeared to be coordinated with H
2O instead. Implications of the effects of the presence of reduced states of Cu on SCR and NO oxidation kinetics will be discussed.
[1] S. Brandenberger, O. Kröcher, A. Tissler, R. Althoff. Catalysis Reviews, 50:4, 492-531, 2008