2009 Annual Meeting
(532g) Large-Area Alignment and Realignment of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymer Thin Films Via Shear
Author
Introduction
Thin films of microphase-separated block copolymers are of interest because they form periodic structures on the order of tens of nanometers, with the domain size tunable by molecular weight
For block copolymer films, no alignment occurs at low shear stresses. Once the stress reaches a threshold (σthresh), the alignment increases quickly as stress increases, and then reaches a plateau where the alignment quality is no longer dependent on stress. Our group proposed a phenomenological model to explain the shear alignment process
Experimental
The diblock copolymer used in this study, PS-PEP 5/13 (5 kg/mol polystyrene and 13 kg/mol poly(ethylene-alt-propylene)), has been characterized previously
Results and Discussion
Real-space images of the film following the first shear showed that alignment can be achieved at high stresses (> 600 Pa). At low stresses no alignment was observed ? only grains of all orientations. In fact, it was difficult to detect the transition region previously seen for sphere-forming [7,10] or other cylinder-forming block copolymers
Moiré pattern imaging was used to reduce the scatter in the low-stress region, since using the interference pattern increases the image window size by an order of magnitude, to the same size as the correlation length. Results showed a sharp transition at 500?600 Pa, which still limits Γ to be greater than 0.1 sec-1, but an accurate determination of σc is now possible: σc = 900±100 Pa. It appears that PS-PEP 5/13 does indeed obey the melting/recrystallization model. One can view the angular distribution to see that below 500 Pa, grains of all orientations are present. In the transition region, the grains at the greatest mismatch to the shear direction are destroyed and a Gaussian-like distribution centered at dθ = 0 forms which narrows with increasing stress.
Double shearing was used to test the model's idea that ?melting? depends on both stress (σ) and misalignment angle (dθ). The overlap region of the two shearing circles is the area of interest and principally contains aligned grains of an orientation which is ideally given by the melting/recrystallization model. Of particular interest is the contour line at dθ = 90°, where complete reorientation will need to take place: in other words, the second shear reorients the cylinders to be perpendicular to their original direction. Since we are interested in reorientation of grains, real-space images were sufficient because images below σthresh would still be aligned with the first shear direction, clearly revealing the value of σthresh. The results of the double-shear experiment do agree very well with the melting/recrystallization model, with the transition from alignment in one direction to alignment in the new shearing direction occurring at the predicted stress. This contrasts with previous work on double shearing of sphere-forming block copolymers
We also observed grain boundary generation within the region transitioning between alignment with the first shear to alignment with the second shear. This is expected within the context of the melting/recrystallization model where sections of the film must ?melt? and then ?recrystallize? in the preferred orientation dictated by the shearing field. This melting/recrystalliztion can occur along a front resulting in the observed grain boundaries. In summary, our model represents the shear-alignment process well by quantitatively capturing the transitions for both alignment and realignment of cylinder-forming block copolymer thin films, and provides the basis for the design of processes whereby tailored local orientation of the cylindrical microdomains can be achieved
References
[2] R. A. Segalman, Mater. Sci.
[3] Y.-R. Hong, K. Asakawa, D. H. Adamson, P. M. Chaikin, and R. A. Register, Opt. Lett. 32, 3125 (2007).
[4] V. Pelletier, K. Asakawa, M. Wu, D. H. Adamson, R. A. Register, and P. M. Chaikin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 211114 (2006).
[5] D. E. Angelescu, J. H. Waller, D. H. Adamson, P. Deshpande, S. Y. Chou, R. A. Register, and P. M. Chaikin, Adv. Mater. 16, 1736 (2004).
[6] V. Pelletier, D. H. Adamson, R. A. Register, and P. M. Chaikin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 163105 (2007).
[7] M. W. Wu, R. A. Register, and P. M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. E 74, 040801 (2006).
[8] C. Harrison, Z. Cheng, S. Sethuraman, D. A. Huse, P. M. Chaikin, D. A. Vega, J. M. Sebastian, R. A. Register, and D. H. Adamson, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011706 (2002).
[9] A. Hexemer, G. E. Stein, E. J. Kramer, and S. Magonov, Macromolecules 38, 7083 (2005).
[10] A. P. Marencic, M. W. Wu, R. A. Register, and P. M. Chaikin, Macromolecules 40, 7299 (2007).
[11] A. Marencic, R. Register, and P. Chaikin, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 53, 44 (2008).