2008 Annual Meeting
(641b) Model Predictive Control of Feed Flow Reversal In a Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process
Authors
These current methods of scale mitigation have several disadvantages, anti-scalants can be expensive, and the addition of excess amounts can actually promote membrane scaling [3]. In the case of the permeate flush, this process will require the reverse osmosis operation to stop for a substantial amount of time to allow for the flushing cycle, eliminating any permeate production (even using up some of the previously produced permeate water). A novel technique called feed flow reversal has been developed which can prevent scale without the addition of expensive chemicals or extensive periods of system down-time [4]. This technique uses a system of actuated valves around the membrane modules configured specifically so that the direction of the feed flow through the membrane units can be reversed. This reversal of the feed flow also reverses the axial salt concentration profile at the surface of the membrane, effectively "resetting the induction clock" [4]. The reversal, if activated after crystals have already formed, also allows a substantial portion of scale deposited on the membrane surface to re-dissolve into solution. Model-predictive control algorithms are applied to a high capacity reverse osmosis system that utilizes feed flow-reversal in order to prevent and/or reverse scale crystal formation on the membrane surface. A dynamic non-linear model which incorporates feed concentration and membrane properties is used for simulation and control purposes [5]. Before flow reversal can take place on a high capacity RO plant, the flow into the membrane unit must be reduced to eliminate the risk of water hammer. A cost-function is formulated for the transition between the normal high flow steady-state operating point to a low flow steady-state operating point where it is safe to reverse the flow direction. Open-loop and closed-loop simulations demonstrate non-linear model-predictive control strategies that transition from the high-flow to low-flow steady-states in an optimal way while subjected to plant-model mismatch on the feed concentration, actuator constraints, and sampled measurements. These model-predictive control (MPC) strategies are compared to proportional integral (PI) control as well as a manually controlled transition.
References:
[1] A. Rahardianto, J. Gao, C. J. Gabelich, M. D. Williams, and Y. Cohen. High recovery mem-
brane desalting of low-salinity brackish water: Integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO. Journal of Membrane Science, 289:123-137, 2007.
[2] D. Hasson, A. Drak, and R. Semiat. Inception of CaSO4 scaling on RO membranes at various
water recovery levels. Desalination, 139:73-81, 2001.
[3] A. Rahardianto, W. Shih, R. Lee, and Y. Cohen. Diagnostic characterization of gypsum scale
formation and control in RO membrane desalination of brackish water. Journal of Membrane
Science, 279:655-668, 2006.
[4] N. Pomerantz, Y. Ladizhansky, E. Korin, M.Waisman, N. Daltrophe, and J. Gilron. Prevention
of scaling of reverse osmosis membranes by "zeroing" the elapsed nucleation time. part i.
calcium sulfate. Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res., 45:2008-2016, 2006.
[5] C. W. McFall, P. D. Christofides, Y. Cohen, and J. F. Davis. Fault-tolerant control of a reverse osmosis desalination process. In Proceedings of 8th IFAC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems, volume 3, pages 163-168, Cancun, Mexico, 2007.