Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 2007 Annual Meeting
- Computing and Systems Technology Division
- Process Design II
- (445a) Multi-Objective Optimization of the Dual Independent Expander Gas-Phase Refrigeration Process for Lng
Alternatively, gas phase refrigeration systems can provide cooling down to cryogenic temperatures. Such systems rely on rotary expansion devices like turbo-expanders to cool the refrigerant gas through near-isentropic expansion. Shaftwork is supplied in the compressors and, simultaneously, recovered from the expanders. The operating costs of the refrigeration systems are dominated by the shaftwork supplied to the compressors.
Foglietta (2004) proposed a dual independent expander refrigeration system to liquefy natural gas using the feed gas to provide cooling to an intermediate temperature level, and then nitrogen refrigerant to subcool the liquefied gas. Shah and Hoadley (2007) studied a multistage gas phase refrigeration process based on the method proposed by Foglietta. A shaftwork targeting method was developed for these multistage refrigeration systems. It was found that the expansion/compression pressure ratio and the heat exchanger ΔTmin were the key parameters affecting energy efficiency as well as the capital cost.
In this work, a multi-objective optimization study has been carried out to optimize the gas phase refrigeration process by varying the parameters such as the ΔTmin and pressure ratio. A 1000 kmol/h natural gas stream at 5.5 MPa and ambient temperature consisting of 96.929 mol% methane, 2.938 mol% ethane, 0.059 mol% propane, 0.01 mol% n-butane and 0.064 mol% nitrogen is liquefied using natural gas as a refrigerant, and subcooled using N2 as a refrigerant. The two objective functions optimized simultaneously are the capital cost and the energy efficiency.
A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Environment was used as an interface to optimize the process simulated in HYSYS (Bhutani et al., 2007), and a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II, Deb et al., 2002) was used to generate the Pareto optimal front. Firstly, the user supplies the values of the genetic algorithm parameters like mutation and crossover probabilities, number of generations, and population size to the Visual Basic interface, which are then passed to the NSGA-II code. A set of decision variables is generated and passed back to the HYSYS simulation through the VB interface. The given objectives are evaluated in the HYSYS spreadsheet and sent back to NSGA-II. After a series of operations like selection, crossover and mutation, a new set of decision variables is generated and supplied back to the VB interface. The procedure continues until it reaches the maximum number of generations, or until the specified convergence criterion is met.
An interesting aspect of the optimisation is the use of a superstructure flowsheet for the process simulation in order to allow for different number of refrigeration stages (from 2 to 8 stages). In this work, natural gas has been used as a refrigerant to liquefy the process natural gas stream. The number of natural gas stages (nNG) is limited to four. Nitrogen has been used for the subcooling of the liquefied natural gas stream. The number of nitrogen stages (nN2) is also limited to four. Therefore, the maximum number of stages can only be eight. Sixteen flowsheets have been created in HYSYS by considering all the possible combinations of nNG and nN2. During the optimization, the number of stages (natural gas and nitrogen refrigeration stages) is calculated based on the value of pressure ratio and the final refrigeration temperature, Tn, selected. Depending upon the values of nNG and nN2, a HYSYS flowsheet is selected and the objectives are then evaluated.
In the present multi-objective optimization study, an extended range of process parameters such as heat exchanger ΔTmin, pressure ratio in the natural gas as well as the nitrogen refrigeration loop, and the number of refrigeration stages have been tested. The results show that three natural gas stages are favored over one or two stages, because one or two stages often involve internal pinching in heat exchangers, resulting in very high heat transfer area. In the case of nitrogen refrigeration, one or two refrigeration stages are favored.
The combination of a flowsheet simulator and the NSGA-II optimizer is a very flexible and powerful tool, which could be applied to many other chemical engineering problems.
References
Bhutani, N., Tarafder, Rangaiah, G. P. and Ray, A. K. (2007), A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Environment for Process Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, In press.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, A. and Meyarivan, T. (2002), A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2), pp. 182-197.
Foglietta, J. H. (2004), Consider Dual Independent Expander Refrigeration for LNG Production, Hydrocarbon Processing, 83, pp. 39.
Shah, N. M. and Hoadley, A. F. A. (2007), A Targeting Methodology for Multistage Gas-Phase Auto Refrigeration Processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. In Press