2006 AIChE Annual Meeting
(242f) Strain Energy Minimum and Vibrational Properties of Single-Walled Aluminosilicate Nanotubes
Authors
First, atomically detailed models of electrically neutral aluminosilicate nanotubes were built with the outer tube diameter varying between 1.5-4.5nm. The nanotube structures were subjected to energy minimization simulation to calculate the normal-mode vibrational frequencies of Al-O and Si-O bonds. The optimized structures were subjected to MD simulations to calculate the internal energy, and Al-O and Si-O bond strain energies as a function of nanotube diameter. The results from the study show a minimum in the internal energy per atom at a nanotube diameter of 2.26nm, a phenomenon that is not observed in the carbon nanotubes. We model the total energy of the nanotube based on harmonic bond stretching energies of Al-O and Si-O bonds, with the assumption of semi-rigid AlO6 octahedra and SiO4 tetrahedra. Note that this assumption is less restrictive than the rigid-body SiO4 models used for predicting flexibility in zeolite frameworks [4]. The bond strain energy - calculated based on the harmonic force constants obtained by nonlinear least squares fit to the simulation data - was found to decrease monotonically for Al-O bonds with increasing nanotube radius, while that of the Si-O increased. Due to the difference in Si-O and Al-O bond energies, and functionalization of the inner wall of the nanotube with silanol groups, a strain energy minimum is thus observed. Further, the model correctly predicted the linear decrease in distances between the aluminum atoms as a function of nanotube radius seen in our simulations. In addition, we also observed a power law dependence of the radial breathing mode (RBM) frequency on the nanotube radius, which is in very good agreement with our theoretical prediction and is in accord with mid-infrared spectroscopic characterization. The present study thus serves as an important starting point for understanding and manipulating the dimensions of this class of metal oxide nanotube materials.
References: [1] Mukherjee, S.; Bartlow, V.M.; Nair, S. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4900. [2] Konduri, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Nair, S. Phys. Rev. B (Submitted) 2006. [3] Ackerman, W. C.; Smith, D. M.; Huling, J. C.; Kim, Y. W.; Bailey, J. K.; Brinker, C. J. Langmuir 1993, 9, 1051. [4] Hammonds, K. D.; Deng, H.; Heine, V.; Dove, M. T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 3701.