Breadcrumb
- Home
- Publications
- Proceedings
- 3rd Latin American Process Safety Conference and Expo
- General Program
- Process Safety Culture, Operational Discipline, and Human Factors
- Improving Safety Communication In Oil Refineries
Safety communication was collected at three oil refineries and one chemical plant (four separate companies in Australia and USA).
We show six examples of actual communication and the improved versions.
The conclusions are:
Refinery employees cannot understand their safety communication.
The average safety email in a refinery can be understood by only 4% of the U.S. population.
Safety communication is much too complicated.
Reading level required for an average safety email is grade-level 16.
The average U.S. adult reads at grade-level 7.
Most safety communication is 9 grade levels above the average reader.
Way too much safety communication is sent.
Safety managers at refineries receive about 50 safety emails every day.
Information overload research shows: once employees reach information overload—the more you send—the less they use—and the worse their performance.
Performance worsens because the time to “manage” all this information is stolen from the time to “understand” it.
Safety communication is not written in a way that frontline supervisors can use.
Safety communication is typically written as text to be read (sentences and paragraphs).
However, supervisors try to deliver this communication orally (projecting the text onto a screen and discussing it during safety meetings).
The solid blocks of text don't project well, the long sentences and paragraphs make discussion impossible, and the communication fails.
Safety communication can be fixed by following some simple communication tips.
Doing these 5 tips will increase comprehension between 100% and 300%.
The full paper can be downloaded at: www.Larkin.Biz. The paper is available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.