2nd China Conference on Process Safety
Quantitative Fire Risk Assessment of Gas Pipeline Leakage
Author
Quantitative fire risk assessment of gas pipeline leakage
HE Jing, College of urban construction and safety engineering, Nanjing university of technology, Nanjing 210000, C hina;
Abstract:  O nce  gas  pipeline  breaks,  compressed  gas  rapidly  expand.  The
electrostatic discharge spark energy can ignite the gas, causing a large range of gas combustion  and   explosion,   and   leading   to   catastrophic   losses.   Due   to   the characteristics of natural gas are flammable and explosive, there exist explosion, fire risk, casualties and damage in transport, storage and using process. In addition,  if leakage continues long time, it can cause long-term harm because of continuous gas supplying.  The  factors  contributing  to  gas pipeline  leakage  most  are  third  party damage, corrosion, design and incorrect operation.
In   this   paper,   the   accident   consequences   of   gas pipeline leakage   and quantitative risk assessment method of gas pipeline leakage consequence are analyzed. Gas pipeline leakage patterns mainly include pipeline completely rupture leakage, big hole leakage and the middle hole leakage. Disaster patterns mainly include flash fire and      vapor     cloud     explosion.     In     order     to     achieve     quantitative fire risk assessment of gas pipeline leakage, flash fire model, vapor cloud explosion model and thermal radiation damage criterion are analyzed. F irstly, the gas leakage quantity is estimated. Then, the incident thermal radiation intensity, damage range and damage area are got by using flash fire model, vapor cloud explosion model and the thermal radiation damage criterion respectively.
Combined with an example of gas pipeline, damage ranges of different disaster patterns are estimated according to different gas pipeline leakage pattern. At the same time the damage degree is assessed.
ï¬ Under the same leakage pattern, the damage ranges varies with different disaster patterns. When the flash fire caused by pipeline completely rupture leakage occurs, people will 100% die in 1min and 1% die in 10s within 244m range. In
contrastï¼?when  the  vapor cloud  explosion caused  by pipeline completely rupture
leakage occurs, people will 100% die in 1min and 1% die in 10s within 60m range. When the range extend to 107m, people will 100% die in 1min and seriously injured in 10s. When the range extend to 176m, people will 1% die in 1min and first-degree burn within 10s.
ï¬ Under the same disaster patterns, the damage ranges varies with different leakage patterns. When the flash fire caused by pipeline completely rupture leakage occurs, people will 100% die in 1min and 1% die in 10s within 244m range. In
contrastï¼?when the flash fire caused by the middle hole leakage occurs, people will
100% die in 1min and 1% die in 10s within 90m range.
The quantitative risk assessment method  for  hazard  evaluation  of  natural  gas pipeline accident can be applied in estimating the gas leakage consequences. Through comparing  the accident consequences  of  gas pipeline leakage,  this paper provides some  reliable  scientific  references  for  gas  pipeline  management  departments  of operation, construction and others.
Keywords:    gas    pipeline;     leakage;     flash     fire;    vapor    cloud     explosion;
quantitative risk assessment
